Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

UK 800m - state of play

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jjimbojames
    commented on 's reply
    It’s an inconsistent measure - finalists by nature have to take into account the strength of people outside of any sample (I.e if the UK had finalists, it could be UK strength, other countries’ weaker or both).

    Also - if we’re saying no 800m finalists = poor, then by inference, 1500m = super strong, as lots of finalists over the OG and WC

  • RunUnlimited
    commented on 's reply
    Add Phoebe Gill (with all the usual caveats about such a young athlete) to that "real deal" list too.

    And but for Burgin's horrible luck with injury this year, it's very possible he could have won gold in Eugene, Birmingham or Munich, such is his talent. As you say, you don't front run 1:43, while holding off some of the world's best 800m runners, without it.

  • Sovietvest
    replied
    Fair enough if Marilyn wants to temper any enthusiasm he may have about our male 800m runners until they win medals. But looking for potential and getting excited about it has always been part of what sports fans do. That doesn't make you naive or unrealistic. And we have more strength in depth now than we've ever had.

    Any objective observer has to see that if Burgin can front run a 1:43, he has the ability to run 1:42. I think he's every bit as exciting as Ovett was when he emerged in 74 and Coe in 78. On the women's side, Abigail Ives looks like the real deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Runner88
    replied
    The criteria of having no world finalists this year or Olympic finalists last year is baffling. It is not the only mark of progress or success within the event. Really strikes as clutching at straws.

    Look at the mens 1500m, a greater strength in depth will see greater success at the top end.

    The shoes are a mute point when comparing the UK guys against the rest of the world. Apart from Kenya perhaps no one else is seeing the strength in depth in the event as in the UK

    Leave a comment:


  • marilyn1
    replied
    Originally posted by MysteryBrick View Post
    Ethan Hussey got the World Junior bronze too.

    The thing that is most important to me is that having this sort of depth forces the top to be good, in order to survive. It's like the US with sprints - if you have enough darts, you'll get a bullseye or two.

    E.g. on the men's side, in 2012 to be ranked top 10 you had to run 1:47.80 and 22 men broke 1:49. In 2017 you needed 1:47.29 for top 10 and 32 men broke 1:49. Now, 10th place is 1:45.56 and 39 men are under 1:49, with 18 men under 1:47 (so ~ the same number of men under 1:47 as under 1:49 in 2012). That means, in order to even make a Uk Champs Final you're looking at needing to be a 1:46 runner at worst, which forces the standards high.
    And in 2012 we had a finalist in the OG final at 800m who ran rather quickly, but in 2021 with all the stats about the wonders of our 800m athletes we had none and this year at the WC, I forget how many 800m finalists at the worlds. I regard Mysterys statistical stuff as rather meaningless. Standards up.,but winners and medalists at globals , none, I believe. The shoes help the numbers and that's for sure.
    worry not , keep talking our mid distance guys up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Runner88
    replied
    Do we know if Shelyna Oskan Clarke has retired? Shame if she has but a career with some great moments she can look back on.

    Leave a comment:


  • marra
    replied
    Whilst it is true that we as fans tend to benefit from more athletes at the top level, meaning stronger GB teams, I can also see from an athlete's POV, if you aren't already at the very top level, you have to ensure you have the right people around you to make sure that you don't get disallusioned with the sport and lose out on the chance of making that breakthrough at a later stage in your career.

    Means that we have to ensure we have the right coaches out there, the right governing body set up and enough quality events to help encourage athletes to keep at it rather than drifting off elsewhere. Lots of work for all involved to do!

    Leave a comment:


  • trickstat
    replied
    Originally posted by Christy93 View Post
    Well put RunUnlimited - The 800 ladies don't get the appreciation they deserve, and ranks look set to strengthen.
    I think one reason for that is that there has been a fairly solid pecking order of 800 specialists* on the women's side over the last couple of season's - Hodgkinson, Reekie, Bell, Baker etc. Those below these haven't been making teams and people perhaps haven't noticed that is often only because there are others taking all the spots, not that they weren't qualified themselves.

    *I did that because i wasn't sure where to put Laura Muir!

    Leave a comment:


  • RunUnlimited
    replied
    BTW, a point that I forgot to mention when Keely Hodgkinson won the 800m gold in Munich.

    It was a particularly poignant victory, both because of the precociousness of Keely's talent and also the place it occurred at.

    The last talent that the UK had over the middle distances of such a young age and achieved so much, was Lillian Board. Olympic silver medallist over 400m in 1968 aged 19 (not only matching the achievement of Ann Packer in the Tokyo games 4 years earlier, but improving on the 800m gold medallist's 400m British record too), then a double European gold medal winner, over 800m and the 4x400m relay, in the Athens European Championships a year later.

    She could have gone on to be the first women to break the 2 minute barrier, a feat not achieved until the 1972 Olympic Games, in the very same stadium that Hodgkinson would make her place in history.

    But alas, as we all know too well, Lillian Board would never get the opportunity to compete for the Olympic gold medal her boundless talent seemed to be aiming at. She would die from bowel cancer only diagnosed properly a few months earlier, and with cruel irony, in a Munich hospital just 13 days after her 22nd birthday, in 1970.

    Such was the impact that Board had on women's international athletics during her tragically cut short life, that not long after her funeral, an avenue leading up to the Munich Olympic Stadium would bare her name: Lillian Board Weg (Lillian Board Way).

    So it was most fitting that Keely would win here in the venue that honoured Board's passing so.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christy93
    commented on 's reply
    Hassan & van Langen were who I had in mind for the Dutch. I had Ivan and Melinte for Romania - Not sure why I omitted them.
    Last edited by Christy93; 25-08-22, 03:44.

  • MysteryBrick
    commented on 's reply
    Over 800m, the only nations faster than Keely's 1:55.88 are:
    Bulgaria
    Burundi
    China
    Cuba
    Czechia
    Germany
    Kenya
    Mozambique
    Netherlands
    Romania
    Russia
    Slovenia
    South Africa
    USA

    And over 1500m, the Burundian, Cuban, Czech, Mozambican, Slovenian and South African records are slower than Zola Budd's junior time.

    So you answer is, Bulgaria, China, Germany, Kenya, Netherlands, Romania, Russia and the USA.

  • jjimbojames
    replied
    Netherlands? Which athlete(s) are you thinking of? I’d have thought Ethiopia more likely.

    Edit: Scrap that - realised you meant national senior records! Romania, probably up there?
    Last edited by jjimbojames; 24-08-22, 23:34.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christy93
    replied
    Well put RunUnlimited - The 800 ladies don't get the appreciation they deserve, and ranks look set to strengthen. Abigail Ives looks a very stylish runner, and I was scrolling Pof10 when I spotted a recent 4.14 from Phoebe Gill to go with her front running 2.03. She'll still be an U20 in 2026 (!!!).

    Speaking of U20s - There can't be many countries with better NRs than Britains junior records (1.55/3.59) in womens middle distance events? USA, Kenya, Netherlands, China* and Russia* are the only ones off the top of my head. Must be a few others, but not too many.

    Leave a comment:


  • RunUnlimited
    replied
    Spot on analysis there MysteryBrick

    And if it's true for the men's 800m, it's almost more so in the women's event. Being a promising junior like Isabelle Boffey, who won all the European age group gold medals, from U18s, U20s and U23s over the distance, would have seen her among the very top contenders for a spot on at least a European Championships GB squad, just a decade or so ago. But peppering the 2:01/2:02 region is just not cutting it in the age of Hodgkinson, Reekie, Bell and a host of others.

    Including Adelle Tracey's times and Katy Ann McDonald's (before the former's change of allegiance and the latter's injury), 8 women have run under 2:01 this year, and another 4 have gone sub 2:03 - which includes U20 Abigail Ives. Just to make any GB team at the UK Olympic Trials, you might need to run under 2 minutes to get in the top 2!

    Higher standards lead to better performances and a greater base of athletes to build from as a result.
    Last edited by RunUnlimited; 25-08-22, 11:46.

    Leave a comment:


  • MysteryBrick
    replied
    Ethan Hussey got the World Junior bronze too.

    The thing that is most important to me is that having this sort of depth forces the top to be good, in order to survive. It's like the US with sprints - if you have enough darts, you'll get a bullseye or two.

    E.g. on the men's side, in 2012 to be ranked top 10 you had to run 1:47.80 and 22 men broke 1:49. In 2017 you needed 1:47.29 for top 10 and 32 men broke 1:49. Now, 10th place is 1:45.56 and 39 men are under 1:49, with 18 men under 1:47 (so ~ the same number of men under 1:47 as under 1:49 in 2012). That means, in order to even make a Uk Champs Final you're looking at needing to be a 1:46 runner at worst, which forces the standards high.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X