Reading the detailed (proven) charges what strikes me is what a puerile and pathetic little man he is. Which is not to say that his behaviour did not have a serious and negative impact on the athletes concerned. Certainly right that he never coaches again.
My second thought was how will this be used against Jess. The problem is that UKA chose to describe the conduct as of the "utmost seriousness". Nonsense there is a range of awful behaviour far worse than what he did and to put this in the same bracket is to diminish what people like Charlie Webster experienced. But that now puts Jess in an impossible position. True to form, up pops Matt Lawton in The Times. It's clear what he's now doing on his Twitter and in his articles - implying that Jess knew all about this behaviour and did nothing to support the affected athletes and isn't speaking out strongly enoug in sufficiently unequivocal terms. Without saying it explicitly, he'll imply she is in some way complicit.
So the outcome won't just be the (rightful) end of Mininchello's career but Lawton (no doubt assisted by Ingle in The Guardian) will also make sure a dent is put in Jess' reputation. (As an aside - both consistently focus on the negatives in the sport in a disproportionate manner). Lawton will now take a story about one man's awful behaviour and turn it into a hatchet job of one of the big names in the sport. How very British.
Like so many women before her, Jess decided to put up with a dickhead in her workplace. Maybe because he's a pathetic bully and she's a strong character, like most bullies he didn't try it on with her. Maybe she was just less affected by it than others But regardless just because others were affected more by his behaviour, it doesn't mean she should share any of the blame. .
My second thought was how will this be used against Jess. The problem is that UKA chose to describe the conduct as of the "utmost seriousness". Nonsense there is a range of awful behaviour far worse than what he did and to put this in the same bracket is to diminish what people like Charlie Webster experienced. But that now puts Jess in an impossible position. True to form, up pops Matt Lawton in The Times. It's clear what he's now doing on his Twitter and in his articles - implying that Jess knew all about this behaviour and did nothing to support the affected athletes and isn't speaking out strongly enoug in sufficiently unequivocal terms. Without saying it explicitly, he'll imply she is in some way complicit.
So the outcome won't just be the (rightful) end of Mininchello's career but Lawton (no doubt assisted by Ingle in The Guardian) will also make sure a dent is put in Jess' reputation. (As an aside - both consistently focus on the negatives in the sport in a disproportionate manner). Lawton will now take a story about one man's awful behaviour and turn it into a hatchet job of one of the big names in the sport. How very British.
Like so many women before her, Jess decided to put up with a dickhead in her workplace. Maybe because he's a pathetic bully and she's a strong character, like most bullies he didn't try it on with her. Maybe she was just less affected by it than others But regardless just because others were affected more by his behaviour, it doesn't mean she should share any of the blame. .
Comment